<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Photoshop going online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/</link>
	<description>llustration, Comics, Animation, and Cartoon Art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 16:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/comment-page-1/#comment-207876</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drawn.ca/2007/03/01/adobe-photoshop-going-online/#comment-207876</guid>
		<description>Hmm, well if Oekaki boards are anything comparable, I know it is possible to implement layers and many other photoshop features into a java applet already.

I am excited to see what they come up with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, well if Oekaki boards are anything comparable, I know it is possible to implement layers and many other photoshop features into a java applet already.</p>
<p>I am excited to see what they come up with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/comment-page-1/#comment-696457</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drawn.ca/2007/03/01/adobe-photoshop-going-online/#comment-696457</guid>
		<description>Hmm, well if Oekaki boards are anything comparable, I know it is possible to implement layers and many other photoshop features into a java applet already.

I am excited to see what they come up with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, well if Oekaki boards are anything comparable, I know it is possible to implement layers and many other photoshop features into a java applet already.</p>
<p>I am excited to see what they come up with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/comment-page-1/#comment-205069</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 05:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drawn.ca/2007/03/01/adobe-photoshop-going-online/#comment-205069</guid>
		<description>Good on Adobe for stepping up. I question the speed and power an online version will have with high-res, multi-layered documents, but this is a great first step, and it&#039;s nice to see them beat Google to the punch (although if there were two brand-names that I almost shamelessly adore as user/consumer they are Google and Adobe).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on Adobe for stepping up. I question the speed and power an online version will have with high-res, multi-layered documents, but this is a great first step, and it&#8217;s nice to see them beat Google to the punch (although if there were two brand-names that I almost shamelessly adore as user/consumer they are Google and Adobe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/comment-page-1/#comment-696456</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drawn.ca/2007/03/01/adobe-photoshop-going-online/#comment-696456</guid>
		<description>Good on Adobe for stepping up. I question the speed and power an online version will have with high-res, multi-layered documents, but this is a great first step, and it&#039;s nice to see them beat Google to the punch (although if there were two brand-names that I almost shamelessly adore as user/consumer they are Google and Adobe).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on Adobe for stepping up. I question the speed and power an online version will have with high-res, multi-layered documents, but this is a great first step, and it&#8217;s nice to see them beat Google to the punch (although if there were two brand-names that I almost shamelessly adore as user/consumer they are Google and Adobe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estamode</title>
		<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/comment-page-1/#comment-205068</link>
		<dc:creator>estamode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drawn.ca/2007/03/01/adobe-photoshop-going-online/#comment-205068</guid>
		<description>*dies from happiness*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*dies from happiness*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estamode</title>
		<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/comment-page-1/#comment-696455</link>
		<dc:creator>estamode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drawn.ca/2007/03/01/adobe-photoshop-going-online/#comment-696455</guid>
		<description>*dies from happiness*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*dies from happiness*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diversionmary</title>
		<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/comment-page-1/#comment-205067</link>
		<dc:creator>diversionmary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drawn.ca/2007/03/01/adobe-photoshop-going-online/#comment-205067</guid>
		<description>Oh yes!
I absolutely agree! Imagemagick and netpbm can only do so much when photoshop can&#039;t be found.

Good find, hopefully they&#039;ll work in some type of collaborative workspace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes!<br />
I absolutely agree! Imagemagick and netpbm can only do so much when photoshop can&#8217;t be found.</p>
<p>Good find, hopefully they&#8217;ll work in some type of collaborative workspace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diversionmary</title>
		<link>http://drawn.ca/archive/adobe-photoshop-going-online/comment-page-1/#comment-696454</link>
		<dc:creator>diversionmary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drawn.ca/2007/03/01/adobe-photoshop-going-online/#comment-696454</guid>
		<description>Oh yes!
I absolutely agree! Imagemagick and netpbm can only do so much when photoshop can&#039;t be found.

Good find, hopefully they&#039;ll work in some type of collaborative workspace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes!<br />
I absolutely agree! Imagemagick and netpbm can only do so much when photoshop can&#8217;t be found.</p>
<p>Good find, hopefully they&#8217;ll work in some type of collaborative workspace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

