Comments on: Ecofont uses 20% less ink

By: Trevour

Trevour — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:04:05 +0000

We had something like this in the mid-’90s at my high school – it was software loaded onto the Macs that saved on inkjet printing. I can’t for the life of me remember what it was called.

By: Trevour

Trevour — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:04:00 +0000

We had something like this in the mid-’90s at my high school – it was software loaded onto the Macs that saved on inkjet printing. I can’t for the life of me remember what it was called.

By: essenmitsosse

essenmitsosse — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:32:57 +0000

This Ecofont ist some of the biggest bullshit ever, it would be much more effective to just use a light font und print it with 70% black. which would be by the way much more legible

By: essenmitsosse

essenmitsosse — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:32:00 +0000

This Ecofont ist some of the biggest bullshit ever, it would be much more effective to just use a light font und print it with 70% black. which would be by the way much more legible

By: TM-Oliveira

TM-Oliveira — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:52:33 +0000

I don’t think that works with really tiny letters.

By: TM-Oliveira

TM-Oliveira — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:52:00 +0000

I don’t think that works with really tiny letters.

By: claud9999

claud9999 — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:57:22 +0000

An outline of a font is more eco…Yes?

By: claud9999

claud9999 — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:57:00 +0000

An outline of a font is more eco…Yes?